WhoVotedWhy

Follow the money

AI companies and investors entered electoral politics in 2025 through rival super PAC networks. This page shows what those PACs spend for and against federal candidates, who funds the PACs, where the funding trail goes dark, and what AI-company employees and PACs give to sitting members. Each number comes from an FEC filing.

Data as of: super PAC spending Sep 11, 2026 · PAC funders Sep 9, 2026 · electioneering Sep 11, 2026 · contributions Sep 9, 2026 (incomplete). What changed

$52.5M

Independent expenditures by the listed AI super PACs, 2026 cycle

45

Candidates targeted, for or against

19

of them members of the 119th Congress

Totals are FEC’s own per-candidate aggregation of Schedule E, which reconciles 24/48-hour notices with the periodic reports that restate them. Latest itemized expenditure dated Aug 31, 2026.

When the money moved

Cumulative 24/48-hour notices by week. Notices are the dated filings; the periodic reports restate them later, so the line is built from notices alone and omits items below the notice threshold.

Leading the Future

33 candidates

Backs candidates who favour a single federal AI framework that pre-empts state rules.

$17.1M

spent supporting

$8.1M

spent opposing

Who funds it

  • A16z Capital Management LLC$50.0M
  • Horowitz, Benjamin · Andreessen Horowitz$25.0M
  • Andreessen, Marc L. · Andreessen Horowitz$25.0M
  • Brockman, Greg · Openai$12.5M
  • Brockman, Anna$12.5M
  • Summit Ridge Media Group LLC$1.1M

$127.7M itemized receipts from outside the network on the PACs' own filings, plus $40.0M transferred between the network's own committees.

The super PAC's donors are itemized on its own FEC Schedule A, so the funders above can be checked against filings. Its affiliated nonprofit, Build American AI, does not disclose donors.

Committees: LEADING THE FUTURE, THINK BIG, AMERICAN MISSION. Evidence ↗ · reviewed Sep 8, 2026

Public First

15 candidates

Backs candidates who favour stronger federal AI safety rules.

$26.2M

spent supporting

$795K

spent opposing

Who funds it

  • Public First Action INC$23.3M
  • Public First$4.3M
  • Elevate America$1.1M
  • Bryson Gillette, LLC$1.0M
  • Daniel, Ziegler Z · Anthropic PBC$550K
  • Donavan, Liam · Self Employed$250K

$32.0M itemized receipts from outside the network on the PACs' own filings.

Jobs and Democracy and Defending Our Values are funded mainly by Public First Action, a 501(c)(4) that does not disclose its donors. Anthropic's gift is known because Anthropic announced it, not from a filing; the PAC says that money is restricted to public education. Dream NYC is the exception: its $2.8M is itemized on its own Schedule A, so the AI-lab money in it is checkable by name — except its largest single source, an entity called Elevate America ($1.15M), which is not the Michigan super PAC of that name and about which the record says nothing.

Committees: JOBS AND DEMOCRACY PAC, DEFENDING OUR VALUES PAC, DREAM NYC. Evidence ↗ · reviewed Sep 9, 2026

Guardrails Alliance

1 candidate

Backs candidates who favour stronger AI rules; formed to counter Leading the Future.

$285K

spent supporting

$0

spent opposing

Who funds it

  • Ceron Uribe, Juan Felipe · Openai$200K
  • Mavrides, Dylan · Jane Street Capital$100K
  • Eliosoff, Jacob · Calibrated Markets LLC$100K
  • O'Farrell, John L. · Not Employed$50K
  • West, Benjamin · Trajectory Labs PBC$50K
  • Aft Solidarity 527$50K

$718K itemized receipts from outside the network on the PACs' own filings.

The super PAC's donors are itemized on its own FEC Schedule A, so the funders above can be checked against filings.

Committees: GUARDRAILS ALLIANCE. Evidence ↗ · reviewed Sep 9, 2026

Raised, and where it went

Left: who gave, from each PAC's own receipts. Right: what the FEC ties to a candidate (ads for or against, Schedule E), spending it does not (staff, polling, ads naming no candidate), and cash still on hand. Transfers between a network's own committees are netted out, so a dollar is counted once.

Leading the Future

$127.7M itemized on the PACs' own receipts. $25.2M has gone to ads for or against candidates. Through Jul 31, 2026, the last periodic report, $12.0M went to spending the FEC does not tie to a candidate and $40.5M was unspent. $50.0M came in after that report and is not yet reported as spent or held.

Public First

$32.0M itemized on the PACs' own receipts. $27.0M has gone to ads for or against candidates. Through Aug 31, 2026, the last periodic report, $3.0M went to spending the FEC does not tie to a candidate and $2.0M was unspent.

Guardrails Alliance

$718K itemized on the PACs' own receipts. $285K has gone to ads for or against candidates. Through Jun 30, 2026, the last periodic report, $59K went to spending the FEC does not tie to a candidate and $397K was unspent. $24K of the outflow is covered by receipts too small to be itemized or by earlier periods.

For and against, by candidate

Spending for a candidate to the right, against to the left, colour by network. Top 15 by money at stake.

CandidateRaceForAgainstBy
on AI, in their own wordsNY-12$17.8M$8.1MPublic First, Leading the Future, Guardrails Alliance
sitting representativeNC-4$1.6MPublic First
on AI, in their own wordsTX-35$1.5MPublic First
campaign site says nothing on AIIL-2$1.4M$1.0M withdrawnLeading the Future, Public First
Kevin HernRepublican
sitting representative
OK Senate$1.3MPublic First, Leading the Future
Ben McadamsDemocrat
on AI, in their own words
UT-1$1.1MLeading the Future
sitting representativeNY-15$1.1MLeading the Future
Celeste MaloyRepublican
sitting representative
UT-3$999KPublic First
GA-1$960KLeading the Future
Rhett MarquesRepublican
AL-2$813KPublic First
Amanda MckinneyRepublican
WA-4$779KLeading the Future
Chris GoberRepublican
TX-10$748KLeading the Future
Scott M. SingerRepublican
FL-25$746KPublic First
FL-25$697KPublic First
Clay FullerRepublican
sitting representative
GA-14$687KLeading the Future
Garland BarrRepublican
sitting representative
KY Senate$676KLeading the Future
Julia LetlowRepublican
sitting representative
LA Senate$667KLeading the Future
TX-9$646KPublic First
sitting representativeNJ-8$638KLeading the Future
AZ-1$616KLeading the Future
sitting representativeCA-19$599KLeading the Future
Aaron FlintRepublican
MT-1$590KLeading the Future
Tom SellRepublican
TX-19$579KLeading the Future
sitting representativeNY-25$572KLeading the Future
OH-7$570KPublic First
TX-8$511KLeading the Future
Laurie BuckhoutRepublican
NC-1$509KLeading the Future
John CowanRepublican
GA-11$502KPublic First
Lindsey GrahamRepublican
former member
SC Senate$374KLeading the Future
Harriet HagemanRepublican
sitting representative
WY Senate$333KLeading the Future
Barry MooreRepublican
sitting representative
AL Senate$330KLeading the Future
Jeremy MossDemocrat
MI-11$295KLeading the Future
sitting representativeOR-4$292KLeading the Future
sitting representativeNY-9$290KLeading the Future
sitting representativeWA-10$288KLeading the Future
Johnny GarrettRepublican
TN-6$288KLeading the Future
Kurt AlmeRepublican
MT Senate$286KLeading the Future
Greg StantonDemocrat
sitting representative
AZ-4$265KLeading the Future
Pete RickettsRepublican
sitting senator
NE Senate$263KPublic First
Houston GainesRepublican
GA-10$262KLeading the Future
Jay ObernolteRepublican
sitting representative
CA-23$260KLeading the Future
Bob BrooksDemocrat
PA-7$250KPublic First
Jace YarbroughRepublican
TX-32$129KLeading the Future
Chris McgowanRepublican
IA-4$104KLeading the Future
TX-9$98KPublic First

Each candidate page lists the filings behind these totals. 841 itemized rows in outside_spending.json. Other super PACs spend in these races; 36 reviewed as not AI-industry money are listed with what they are in excluded_committees.json.

Electioneering ads by the networks' nonprofits

Most of the money on the AI side of the 2026 cycle sits in 501(c)(4) nonprofits that file no Schedule E. The one thing they must report is a broadcast ad naming a candidate inside 60 days of the general election or 30 days of a primary (FEC Form 9). The general-election window opened on Sep 4, 2026.

$105K across 1 filings.

FilerCandidate namedDateAmount
Public First Action INC. · Public FirstBudzinski, NikkiMar 5, 2026$105Kfiling ↗

Contributions to sitting members

Itemized receipts where the contributor works for an AI company or investor, or the contributor is a company PAC. Personal gifts by employees are not company money; the member page separates the two.

Citing this page

The headline figure is $52.5M.

The headline is the sum of FEC's per-candidate, per-committee aggregates for the committees listed in super_pacs.json, 2026 cycle. It is spending by those committees, not all AI-related political money: nonprofits in the same networks file no Schedule E.

Primary source: FEC Schedule E filings via OpenFEC. The rows behind this page are outside_spending_totals.json, read 2026-09-11; the manifest carries the commit and checksums.

  • Do not add outside_spending.json rows to reproduce the total: 24/48-hour notices are restated on later periodic reports.
  • Totals are to the cent in the data; the page rounds.
  • Contributions to members are a separate table (donations.json) and a separate kind of money; do not add the two.
  • A candidate absent from the table has no reported spending by the listed committees, which is not the same as no AI money in the race.

Suggested wording: “according to FEC Schedule E filings via OpenFEC, compiled by WhoVotedWhy as of 2026-09-11”. Cite the filing or roll call for the event and this site for the selection and totals.

Something wrong? Report an error with the row id; corrections are logged in overrides.json.