Skip to content
WhoVotedWhy
119th Congress · HR.10180In committeeCongress.gov ↗JSONReport an error

Self-Improving AI Monitoring Act

Summary, written by a model from the CRS summary

No bill text was provided; the title indicates it requires monitoring of self-improving AI.

Model-rated AI relevance 90%: The title points directly at AI safety governance. (claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026)

safety

Data as of: bills Oct 22, 2026 · votes Oct 21, 2026 · statements Oct 19, 2026. What changed

Progress

  1. Introduced

    Aug 27, 2026

  2. Reported by committee

    —

  3. Passed House

    —

  4. Passed Senate

    —

  5. Became law

    —

Latest action · August 27, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

What members said

Releases that cite this bill first, then releases on the same topics.

Pat HarriganRepublicanmixedAug 31, 2026 · cites this bill by title

Harrigan backs bipartisan monitoring of self-improving AI through NIST while stressing the bill imposes no new mandates and won't impede innovation.

Source ↗
George WhitesidesDemocrattoward oversightAug 29, 2026 · cites this bill by title

Whitesides introduces the Self-Improving AI Monitoring Act to give federal evaluators visibility into frontier labs' automated AI R&D and reduce superintelligence risk.

Source ↗
Sara JacobsDemocrattoward oversightOct 16, 2026 · same topic

Jacobs argues Congress should pursue both AI innovation and safety guardrails, addressing societal, model, deployer, and impact-level risks rather than prioritizing speed over safety.

Source ↗
Pete RickettsRepublicanmixedOct 14, 2026 · same topic

Ricketts supports strengthening American AI innovation and export controls on chips to China while backing 'commonsense guardrails' for safety without stifling innovation.

Source ↗
Alexandria Ocasio-CortezDemocrattoward oversightOct 13, 2026 · same topic

Ocasio-Cortez and colleagues urge the FAA to pause its AI air traffic management tool until safety testing, oversight, and accountability questions are answered.

Source ↗
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocratneutralOct 13, 2026 · same topic

Blunt Rochester describes meetings with AI experts and OpenAI leadership to discuss national security threats and recent AI safety issues, without stating a specific policy position.

Source ↗
Mark KellyDemocrattoward oversightOct 13, 2026 · same topic

Kelly advocates legislation requiring human oversight and accountability for military AI, ensuring servicemembers can operate when AI systems fail.

Source ↗
Tom BarrettRepublicantoward oversightOct 9, 2026 · same topic

Barrett introduced legislation creating a Cabinet-level federal office to oversee AI and emerging technology threats and ensure strong guardrails.

Source ↗

Bill data read 2026-10-22T14:48:01.167Z