National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027
On the curated watchlist: tracked regardless of the classifier's relevance score.
Summary, written by a model from the CRS summary
The FY2027 NDAA sets DOD policy and authorizations, including on cyber and artificial intelligence. It also covers critical materials and equity investments by the Office of Strategic Capital.
Model-rated AI relevance 50%: This is a broad defense bill with AI provisions. (claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026)
Sponsored by
Roger WickerRepublicanMSData as of: bills Oct 22, 2026 · votes Oct 21, 2026 · statements Oct 19, 2026. What changed
Progress
Introduced
Jun 15, 2026
Reported by committee
Jun 15, 2026
Passed House
—
Passed Senate
—
Became law
—
Latest action · July 27, 2026
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. (CR S4276)
Recorded votes
Floor votes carry every member's position; committee tallies carry totals only.
What members said
Releases that cite this bill first, then releases on the same topics.
Cammack touts NDAA amendments accelerating military AI adoption and prioritizing university AI research partnerships while requiring reporting to Congress.
Source ↗Jacobs argues Congress should pursue both AI innovation and safety guardrails, addressing societal, model, deployer, and impact-level risks rather than prioritizing speed over safety.
Source ↗Gottheimer touted bipartisan AI bills balancing innovation leadership with safeguards like pre-deployment testing and human control over AI agents.
Source ↗Ricketts supports strengthening American AI innovation and export controls on chips to China while backing 'commonsense guardrails' for safety without stifling innovation.
Source ↗Blunt Rochester describes meetings with AI experts and OpenAI leadership to discuss national security threats and recent AI safety issues, without stating a specific policy position.
Source ↗Kelly advocates legislation requiring human oversight and accountability for military AI, ensuring servicemembers can operate when AI systems fail.
Source ↗Barrett introduced legislation creating a Cabinet-level federal office to oversee AI and emerging technology threats and ensure strong guardrails.
Source ↗Gooden asked DNI Clayton to assess U.S. AI defenses against foreign adversaries and identify where congressional legislative action is needed.
Source ↗Bill data read 2026-10-22T14:48:01.167Z