Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
On the curated watchlist: tracked regardless of the classifier's relevance score.
Summary, written by a model from the CRS summary
The FY2026 NDAA sets DOD policy and authorizations, including provisions on cyber activities and artificial intelligence.
Model-rated AI relevance 50%: This is a broad defense bill that includes AI provisions. (claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026)
Sponsored by
Mike RogersRepublicanALData as of: bills Oct 22, 2026 · votes Oct 21, 2026 · statements Oct 19, 2026. What changed
Progress
Introduced
Jun 9, 2025
Reported by committee
Jul 15, 2025
Passed House
Sep 10, 2025
Passed Senate
—
Became law
—
Latest action · September 30, 2025
Received in the Senate.
Recorded votes
Floor votes carry every member's position; committee tallies carry totals only.
Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
On Motion to Recommit · Failed
Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
On Passage · Passed
Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) · Armed Services Committee
What members said
Releases that cite this bill first, then releases on the same topics.
Jacobs argues Congress should pursue both AI innovation and safety guardrails, addressing societal, model, deployer, and impact-level risks rather than prioritizing speed over safety.
Source ↗Gottheimer touted bipartisan AI bills balancing innovation leadership with safeguards like pre-deployment testing and human control over AI agents.
Source ↗Ricketts supports strengthening American AI innovation and export controls on chips to China while backing 'commonsense guardrails' for safety without stifling innovation.
Source ↗Blunt Rochester describes meetings with AI experts and OpenAI leadership to discuss national security threats and recent AI safety issues, without stating a specific policy position.
Source ↗Kelly advocates legislation requiring human oversight and accountability for military AI, ensuring servicemembers can operate when AI systems fail.
Source ↗Barrett introduced legislation creating a Cabinet-level federal office to oversee AI and emerging technology threats and ensure strong guardrails.
Source ↗Gooden asked DNI Clayton to assess U.S. AI defenses against foreign adversaries and identify where congressional legislative action is needed.
Source ↗Schiff called for sensible regulation and 'constructive oversight' of AI, including making industry pay for its energy use, while competing with China.
Source ↗Bill data read 2026-10-22T14:48:01.167Z