Healthy Technology Act of 2025
Summary, written by a model from the CRS summary
Allows AI or machine learning technology to qualify as a practitioner who can prescribe drugs, if state law authorizes it and the technology is FDA approved, cleared, or authorized.
Model-rated AI relevance 85%: It directly sets the legal status of AI in prescribing drugs. (claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026)
Sponsored by
David SchweikertRepublicanAZData as of: bills Oct 22, 2026 · votes Oct 21, 2026 · statements Oct 19, 2026. What changed
Progress
Introduced
Jan 7, 2025
Reported by committee
—
Passed House
—
Passed Senate
—
Became law
—
Latest action · January 7, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
What members said
Releases that cite this bill first, then releases on the same topics.
Kelly advocates legislation requiring human oversight and accountability for military AI, ensuring servicemembers can operate when AI systems fail.
Source ↗Trahan's CLAIM Act would hold AI developers legally liable for harms caused by autonomous AI agents.
Source ↗DelBene is filing a FOIA request to force disclosure of information on a flawed AI-driven Medicare claims review program, calling for accountability and transparency.
Source ↗Rep. Jayapal proposes requiring AI companies to obtain a federal charter with strict safety mandates and accountability before harm occurs.
Source ↗Gallego warns about rogue AI models and the lack of reporting requirements or kill switches, calling for stronger oversight and accountability.
Source ↗Hawley led a hearing on rogue AI cyberattacks and called for AI companies to be held liable for damage caused by their AI agents.
Source ↗Hawley and Murphy introduced bipartisan legislation holding AI agent operators and developers liable for hacking incidents caused by their products.
Source ↗Murphy and Hawley announced bipartisan legislation imposing criminal and civil liability on AI developers and operators for hacking damage caused by their AI agents.
Source ↗Bill data read 2026-10-22T14:48:01.167Z