AI Threat Output and Monitoring Incident Containment Act
Summary, written by a model from the CRS summary
Addresses monitoring and containment of dangerous AI model outputs and incidents. It aims to catch and contain threatening AI behavior before harm spreads.
Model-rated AI relevance 95%.
Sponsored by
Celeste MaloyRepublicanUTData as of: bills Sep 9, 2026 · votes Sep 11, 2026 · statements Sep 9, 2026. What changed
Progress
Introduced
Jul 27, 2026
Reported by committee
—
Passed House
—
Passed Senate
—
Became law
—
Latest action · July 27, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
What members said
Releases that cite this bill first, then releases on the same topics.
Barrett introduces bills barring federal override of local data center zoning and banning congressional NDAs, and touts cosponsorship of AI safeguards on chatbots for minors, nuclear risk, and autonomous weapons.
Source ↗Maloy introduces the bipartisan ATOMIC Act requiring DOE evaluation of frontier AI systems for nuclear-related risks.
Source ↗Jacobs co-leads the ATOMIC Act to create common-sense guardrails identifying and mitigating AI-related nuclear risks.
Source ↗Sanders would permanently ban superintelligent AI and pause advanced AI development until a new federal regulator sets safety rules.
Source ↗Warnock calls for a statewide moratorium on AI data center construction unless projects guarantee no utility cost hikes, no NDAs, no tax giveaways, and no pollution.
Source ↗Hawley is investigating AI surveillance camera companies, arguing Congress never authorized these invasive AI-driven networks and that corporate self-policing is an inadequate safeguard.
Source ↗Foster would restore NCUA and FHFA authority over third-party tech vendors because AI makes cyberattacks on the financial system more sophisticated.
Source ↗Franklin touts $2.9 million for a Florida Poly lab doing applied AI and cybersecurity research and workforce training.
Source ↗Bill data read 2026-09-09T02:09:45.522Z