Kids Online Safety Act
Summary, written by a model from the CRS summary
Requires online platforms used by minors to exercise reasonable care to prevent harm and to provide safeguards and parental tools. It also requires notice and a non-personalized option for algorithms that use user-specific data.
Model-rated AI relevance 40%: The algorithmic recommendation provisions touch on AI governance, but the bill mainly addresses child online safety. (claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026)
Sponsored by
Marsha BlackburnRepublicanTNData as of: bills Oct 22, 2026 · votes Oct 21, 2026 · statements Oct 19, 2026. What changed
Progress
Introduced
May 14, 2025
Reported by committee
Aug 5, 2026
Passed House
—
Passed Senate
—
Became law
—
Latest action · August 5, 2026
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
What members said
Releases that cite this bill first, then releases on the same topics.
Moody called for Congress to act to protect children and seniors from AI-enabled scams, deepfakes, and addictive algorithms while also winning the AI race against China.
Source ↗Blackburn demands TikTok answer for withholding algorithmic safety protections from children and backs the Kids Online Safety Act requiring platforms to design recommendation systems with child safety in mind.
Source ↗Thune touts his Filter Bubble Transparency Act to require platforms to disclose their secret algorithms and offer users un-curated feeds, enforced by the FTC.
Source ↗Curtis touts committee passage of AI chatbot and kids' AI safety bills requiring disclosures, parental notification, and privacy protections, while saying rules must protect children without stifling innovation.
Source ↗Husted champions the bipartisan CHAT Act 2.0 to impose a federal risk-based regulatory framework with guardrails on AI companion chatbots used by minors.
Source ↗Jacobs argues Congress should pursue both AI innovation and safety guardrails, addressing societal, model, deployer, and impact-level risks rather than prioritizing speed over safety.
Source ↗Clarke reintroduced legislation requiring disclosure when generative AI is used in political advertising to protect election transparency.
Source ↗Ricketts supports strengthening American AI innovation and export controls on chips to China while backing 'commonsense guardrails' for safety without stifling innovation.
Source ↗Bill data read 2026-10-22T14:48:01.167Z