Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2025
Summary, written by a model from the CRS summary
The bill bans knowingly spreading materially false voting information within 60 days of a federal election with intent to stop someone from voting, and separately bans using an AI system to generate such false information with that intent. It creates criminal penalties, a private right of action, and requires DOJ to issue corrective information in some cases.
Model-rated AI relevance 75%: It contains an explicit, operative prohibition on using AI systems to produce election disinformation, though AI is one part of a broader election-integrity bill. (claude-opus-5, Sep 9, 2026)
Sponsored by
Angela AlsobrooksDemocratMDData as of: bills Sep 9, 2026 · votes Sep 11, 2026 · statements Sep 9, 2026. What changed
Progress
Introduced
Sep 18, 2025
Reported by committee
—
Passed House
—
Passed Senate
—
Became law
—
Latest action · September 18, 2025
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
What members said
Releases that cite this bill first, then releases on the same topics.
Warnock calls for a statewide moratorium on AI data center construction unless projects guarantee no utility cost hikes, no NDAs, no tax giveaways, and no pollution.
Source ↗Hawley is investigating AI surveillance camera companies, arguing Congress never authorized these invasive AI-driven networks and that corporate self-policing is an inadequate safeguard.
Source ↗Barrett's bipartisan Doctors Not AI Act would bar AI from making medical-necessity insurance denials and require disclosure of AI use.
Source ↗Evans promotes American open-source AI leadership against China while adding commonsense consumer guardrails and mandated federal risk assessments of adversary models.
Source ↗Landsman's Doctors Not AI Act would keep licensed clinicians, not algorithms, in charge of medical-necessity decisions with transparency for patients.
Source ↗Schrier's Doctors Not AI Act would require doctors rather than AI systems to make health coverage decisions, with oversight and disclosure.
Source ↗Harrigan backs bipartisan monitoring of self-improving AI through NIST while stressing the bill imposes no new mandates and won't impede innovation.
Source ↗Jacobs introduces bipartisan legislation creating a DoD-wide AI incident and vulnerability reporting program to make military AI safer and more accountable.
Source ↗Bill data read 2026-09-09T02:09:45.522Z