A resolution affirming the critical importance of preserving the United States' advantage in artificial intelligence and ensuring that the United States achieves and maintains artificial intelligence dominance.
Summary, written by a model from the CRS summary
A resolution affirming that it is important for the United States to preserve its advantage in AI and to achieve and maintain AI dominance.
Model-rated AI relevance 80%: It is non-binding but directly about national AI strategy. (claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026)
Sponsored by
Christopher CoonsDemocratDEData as of: bills Oct 22, 2026 · votes Oct 21, 2026 · statements Oct 19, 2026. What changed
Progress
Introduced
Nov 6, 2025
Reported by committee
—
Passed House
—
Passed Senate
—
Became law
—
Latest action · November 6, 2025
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
What members said
Releases that cite this bill first, then releases on the same topics.
Jacobs argues Congress should pursue both AI innovation and safety guardrails, addressing societal, model, deployer, and impact-level risks rather than prioritizing speed over safety.
Source ↗Gottheimer touted bipartisan AI bills balancing innovation leadership with safeguards like pre-deployment testing and human control over AI agents.
Source ↗Ricketts supports strengthening American AI innovation and export controls on chips to China while backing 'commonsense guardrails' for safety without stifling innovation.
Source ↗Blunt Rochester describes meetings with AI experts and OpenAI leadership to discuss national security threats and recent AI safety issues, without stating a specific policy position.
Source ↗Kelly advocates legislation requiring human oversight and accountability for military AI, ensuring servicemembers can operate when AI systems fail.
Source ↗Barrett introduced legislation creating a Cabinet-level federal office to oversee AI and emerging technology threats and ensure strong guardrails.
Source ↗Gooden asked DNI Clayton to assess U.S. AI defenses against foreign adversaries and identify where congressional legislative action is needed.
Source ↗Schiff called for sensible regulation and 'constructive oversight' of AI, including making industry pay for its energy use, while competing with China.
Source ↗Bill data read 2026-10-22T14:48:01.167Z