Skip to content
WhoVotedWhy
119th Congress · SRES.490In committeeCongress.gov ↗JSONReport an error

A resolution affirming the critical importance of preserving the United States' advantage in artificial intelligence and ensuring that the United States achieves and maintains artificial intelligence dominance.

Summary, written by a model from the CRS summary

A resolution affirming that it is important for the United States to preserve its advantage in AI and to achieve and maintain AI dominance.

Model-rated AI relevance 80%: It is non-binding but directly about national AI strategy. (claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026)

national security

Data as of: bills Oct 22, 2026 · votes Oct 21, 2026 · statements Oct 19, 2026. What changed

Progress

  1. Introduced

    Nov 6, 2025

  2. Reported by committee

    —

  3. Passed House

    —

  4. Passed Senate

    —

  5. Became law

    —

Latest action · November 6, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

What members said

Releases that cite this bill first, then releases on the same topics.

Sara JacobsDemocrattoward oversightOct 16, 2026 · same topic

Jacobs argues Congress should pursue both AI innovation and safety guardrails, addressing societal, model, deployer, and impact-level risks rather than prioritizing speed over safety.

Source ↗
Josh GottheimerDemocratmixedOct 15, 2026 · same topic

Gottheimer touted bipartisan AI bills balancing innovation leadership with safeguards like pre-deployment testing and human control over AI agents.

Source ↗
Pete RickettsRepublicanmixedOct 14, 2026 · same topic

Ricketts supports strengthening American AI innovation and export controls on chips to China while backing 'commonsense guardrails' for safety without stifling innovation.

Source ↗
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocratneutralOct 13, 2026 · same topic

Blunt Rochester describes meetings with AI experts and OpenAI leadership to discuss national security threats and recent AI safety issues, without stating a specific policy position.

Source ↗
Mark KellyDemocrattoward oversightOct 13, 2026 · same topic

Kelly advocates legislation requiring human oversight and accountability for military AI, ensuring servicemembers can operate when AI systems fail.

Source ↗
Tom BarrettRepublicantoward oversightOct 9, 2026 · same topic

Barrett introduced legislation creating a Cabinet-level federal office to oversee AI and emerging technology threats and ensure strong guardrails.

Source ↗
Lance GoodenRepublicantoward oversightOct 9, 2026 · same topic

Gooden asked DNI Clayton to assess U.S. AI defenses against foreign adversaries and identify where congressional legislative action is needed.

Source ↗
Adam SchiffDemocrattoward oversightOct 9, 2026 · same topic

Schiff called for sensible regulation and 'constructive oversight' of AI, including making industry pay for its energy use, while competing with China.

Source ↗

Bill data read 2026-10-22T14:48:01.167Z