WhoVotedWhy
119th Congress · HR.5078PassedCongress.gov ↗JSONReport an error

PILLAR Act

Summary, written by a model from the CRS summary

Extends and expands the State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program through FY2035, explicitly making systems that use artificial intelligence eligible for protection with grant funds. GAO must review AI adoption across a sample of grants, and funds cannot buy products misaligned with CISA guidance.

Model-rated AI relevance 65%.

national securityprocurementsafety

Data as of: bills Sep 9, 2026 · votes Sep 11, 2026 · statements Sep 9, 2026. What changed

Progress

  1. Introduced

    Sep 2, 2025

  2. Reported by committee

    Sep 3, 2025

  3. Passed House

    Nov 17, 2025

  4. Passed Senate

  5. Became law

Latest action · November 18, 2025

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Recorded votes

Floor votes carry every member's position; committee tallies carry totals only.

What members said

Releases that cite this bill first, then releases on the same topics.

Bernard SandersIndependenttoward oversightSep 3, 2026 · same topic

Sanders would permanently ban superintelligent AI and pause advanced AI development until a new federal regulator sets safety rules.

Source ↗
Joshua HawleyRepublicantoward oversightSep 3, 2026 · same topic

Hawley is investigating AI surveillance camera companies, arguing Congress never authorized these invasive AI-driven networks and that corporate self-policing is an inadequate safeguard.

Source ↗
Bill FosterDemocrattoward oversightSep 2, 2026 · same topic

Foster would restore NCUA and FHFA authority over third-party tech vendors because AI makes cyberattacks on the financial system more sophisticated.

Source ↗
C. FranklinRepublicanneutralSep 2, 2026 · same topic

Franklin touts $2.9 million for a Florida Poly lab doing applied AI and cybersecurity research and workforce training.

Source ↗
Gabe EvansRepublicanmixedSep 1, 2026 · same topic

Evans promotes American open-source AI leadership against China while adding commonsense consumer guardrails and mandated federal risk assessments of adversary models.

Source ↗
Pat HarriganRepublicanmixedAug 31, 2026 · same topic

Harrigan backs bipartisan monitoring of self-improving AI through NIST while stressing the bill imposes no new mandates and won't impede innovation.

Source ↗
Sara JacobsDemocrattoward oversightAug 31, 2026 · same topic

Jacobs introduces bipartisan legislation creating a DoD-wide AI incident and vulnerability reporting program to make military AI safer and more accountable.

Source ↗
Josh GottheimerDemocratmixedAug 31, 2026 · same topic

The 9/11 Review Task Force report treats AI as both an emerging threat and a tool intelligence agencies should adopt, with recommendations balancing modernization against privacy and civil liberties.

Source ↗

Bill data read 2026-09-09T02:09:45.522Z