Conversational AI Services Act
Summary, written by a model from the CRS summary
The bill addresses conversational AI services.
Model-rated AI relevance 90%: It directly regulates a category of AI services. (claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026)
Sponsored by
Mariannette Miller-MeeksRepublicanIAData as of: bills Oct 22, 2026 · votes Oct 21, 2026 · statements Oct 19, 2026. What changed
Progress
Introduced
Jul 16, 2026
Reported by committee
—
Passed House
—
Passed Senate
—
Became law
—
Latest action · July 16, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
What members said
Releases that cite this bill first, then releases on the same topics.
Miller-Meeks introduces federal legislation imposing guardrails on AI chatbots to protect minors while claiming a pro-innovation, risk-based approach.
Source ↗Jacobs argues Congress should pursue both AI innovation and safety guardrails, addressing societal, model, deployer, and impact-level risks rather than prioritizing speed over safety.
Source ↗Clarke reintroduced legislation requiring disclosure when generative AI is used in political advertising to protect election transparency.
Source ↗Ricketts supports strengthening American AI innovation and export controls on chips to China while backing 'commonsense guardrails' for safety without stifling innovation.
Source ↗Ocasio-Cortez and colleagues urge the FAA to pause its AI air traffic management tool until safety testing, oversight, and accountability questions are answered.
Source ↗Blunt Rochester describes meetings with AI experts and OpenAI leadership to discuss national security threats and recent AI safety issues, without stating a specific policy position.
Source ↗Kelly advocates legislation requiring human oversight and accountability for military AI, ensuring servicemembers can operate when AI systems fail.
Source ↗Barrett introduced legislation creating a Cabinet-level federal office to oversee AI and emerging technology threats and ensure strong guardrails.
Source ↗Bill data read 2026-10-22T14:48:01.167Z