Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2025
Summary, written by a model from the CRS summary
Identical companion bill: it prohibits knowingly communicating materially false voting information within 60 days of a federal election with intent to suppress votes, and specifically prohibits using an artificial intelligence system to produce such false information. It adds criminal penalties, a private right of action, DOJ corrective-information duties, and expands voter-intimidation protections to ballot processing and certification.
Model-rated AI relevance 75%: Same as the companion bill — an express AI-use prohibition sits inside a broader election-integrity framework. (claude-opus-5, Sep 9, 2026)
Sponsored by
Jennifer McClellanDemocratVAData as of: bills Sep 9, 2026 · votes Sep 11, 2026 · statements Sep 9, 2026. What changed
Progress
Introduced
Aug 5, 2025
Reported by committee
—
Passed House
—
Passed Senate
—
Became law
—
Latest action · August 5, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
What members said
Releases that cite this bill first, then releases on the same topics.
Warnock calls for a statewide moratorium on AI data center construction unless projects guarantee no utility cost hikes, no NDAs, no tax giveaways, and no pollution.
Source ↗Hawley is investigating AI surveillance camera companies, arguing Congress never authorized these invasive AI-driven networks and that corporate self-policing is an inadequate safeguard.
Source ↗Barrett's bipartisan Doctors Not AI Act would bar AI from making medical-necessity insurance denials and require disclosure of AI use.
Source ↗Evans promotes American open-source AI leadership against China while adding commonsense consumer guardrails and mandated federal risk assessments of adversary models.
Source ↗Landsman's Doctors Not AI Act would keep licensed clinicians, not algorithms, in charge of medical-necessity decisions with transparency for patients.
Source ↗Schrier's Doctors Not AI Act would require doctors rather than AI systems to make health coverage decisions, with oversight and disclosure.
Source ↗Harrigan backs bipartisan monitoring of self-improving AI through NIST while stressing the bill imposes no new mandates and won't impede innovation.
Source ↗Jacobs introduces bipartisan legislation creating a DoD-wide AI incident and vulnerability reporting program to make military AI safer and more accountable.
Source ↗Bill data read 2026-09-09T02:09:45.522Z