Skip to content
WhoVotedWhy
119th Congress · HR.6275MarkupCongress.gov ↗JSONReport an error

China AI Power Report Act

Summary, written by a model from the CRS summary

Concerns a report on China's AI power, per its title.

Model-rated AI relevance 75%: AI competition and national security reporting. (claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026)

national security

Data as of: bills Oct 22, 2026 · votes Oct 21, 2026 · statements Oct 19, 2026. What changed

Progress

  1. Introduced

    Nov 21, 2025

  2. Reported by committee

    Jan 21, 2026

  3. Passed House

    —

  4. Passed Senate

    —

  5. Became law

    —

Latest action · January 21, 2026

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 47 - 0.

Recorded votes

Floor votes carry every member's position; committee tallies carry totals only.

What members said

Releases that cite this bill first, then releases on the same topics.

Jon HustedRepublicantoward oversightAug 11, 2026 · cites this bill by title

Husted pushes bills requiring annual reporting on China's AI stack and stronger export-control enforcement to protect U.S. AI and chip technology.

Source ↗
Mark WarnerDemocrattoward oversightAug 11, 2026 · cites this bill by title

Warner backs bipartisan bills requiring annual reporting on China's AI stack and strengthening export-control enforcement to protect U.S. AI and chip leadership.

Source ↗
Sara JacobsDemocrattoward oversightOct 16, 2026 · same topic

Jacobs argues Congress should pursue both AI innovation and safety guardrails, addressing societal, model, deployer, and impact-level risks rather than prioritizing speed over safety.

Source ↗
Josh GottheimerDemocratmixedOct 15, 2026 · same topic

Gottheimer touted bipartisan AI bills balancing innovation leadership with safeguards like pre-deployment testing and human control over AI agents.

Source ↗
Pete RickettsRepublicanmixedOct 14, 2026 · same topic

Ricketts supports strengthening American AI innovation and export controls on chips to China while backing 'commonsense guardrails' for safety without stifling innovation.

Source ↗
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocratneutralOct 13, 2026 · same topic

Blunt Rochester describes meetings with AI experts and OpenAI leadership to discuss national security threats and recent AI safety issues, without stating a specific policy position.

Source ↗
Mark KellyDemocrattoward oversightOct 13, 2026 · same topic

Kelly advocates legislation requiring human oversight and accountability for military AI, ensuring servicemembers can operate when AI systems fail.

Source ↗
Tom BarrettRepublicantoward oversightOct 9, 2026 · same topic

Barrett introduced legislation creating a Cabinet-level federal office to oversee AI and emerging technology threats and ensure strong guardrails.

Source ↗

Bill data read 2026-10-22T14:48:01.167Z