Skip to content
WhoVotedWhy
119th Congress · S.5382In committeeCongress.gov ↗JSONReport an error

China AI Power Report Act

Summary, written by a model from the CRS summary

Only the title was provided. It refers to a report on China's AI power.

Model-rated AI relevance 75%: The title concerns AI competition with China, but it appears to cover a report only and no text was provided. (claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026)

national security

Data as of: bills Oct 22, 2026 · votes Oct 21, 2026 · statements Oct 19, 2026. What changed

Progress

  1. Introduced

    Aug 7, 2026

  2. Reported by committee

    —

  3. Passed House

    —

  4. Passed Senate

    —

  5. Became law

    —

Latest action · August 7, 2026

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

What members said

Releases that cite this bill first, then releases on the same topics.

Jon HustedRepublicantoward oversightAug 11, 2026 · cites this bill by title

Husted pushes bills requiring annual reporting on China's AI stack and stronger export-control enforcement to protect U.S. AI and chip technology.

Source ↗
Mark WarnerDemocrattoward oversightAug 11, 2026 · cites this bill by title

Warner backs bipartisan bills requiring annual reporting on China's AI stack and strengthening export-control enforcement to protect U.S. AI and chip leadership.

Source ↗
Sara JacobsDemocrattoward oversightOct 16, 2026 · same topic

Jacobs argues Congress should pursue both AI innovation and safety guardrails, addressing societal, model, deployer, and impact-level risks rather than prioritizing speed over safety.

Source ↗
Josh GottheimerDemocratmixedOct 15, 2026 · same topic

Gottheimer touted bipartisan AI bills balancing innovation leadership with safeguards like pre-deployment testing and human control over AI agents.

Source ↗
Pete RickettsRepublicanmixedOct 14, 2026 · same topic

Ricketts supports strengthening American AI innovation and export controls on chips to China while backing 'commonsense guardrails' for safety without stifling innovation.

Source ↗
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocratneutralOct 13, 2026 · same topic

Blunt Rochester describes meetings with AI experts and OpenAI leadership to discuss national security threats and recent AI safety issues, without stating a specific policy position.

Source ↗
Mark KellyDemocrattoward oversightOct 13, 2026 · same topic

Kelly advocates legislation requiring human oversight and accountability for military AI, ensuring servicemembers can operate when AI systems fail.

Source ↗
Tom BarrettRepublicantoward oversightOct 9, 2026 · same topic

Barrett introduced legislation creating a Cabinet-level federal office to oversee AI and emerging technology threats and ensure strong guardrails.

Source ↗

Bill data read 2026-10-22T14:48:01.167Z