AI PLAN Act
Summary, written by a model from the CRS summary
Requires Treasury, DHS, and Commerce to report on the risks of adversaries using AI to commit financial crimes, such as deepfakes, voice cloning, and synthetic identities. After the report, the agencies must recommend legislation and best practices.
Model-rated AI relevance 85%: The bill directly addresses AI-enabled financial crime risks, but it only requires a report and recommendations. (claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026)
Sponsored by
Zachary (Zach) NunnRepublicanIAData as of: bills Oct 22, 2026 · votes Oct 21, 2026 · statements Oct 19, 2026. What changed
Progress
Introduced
Mar 14, 2025
Reported by committee
May 13, 2026
Passed House
—
Passed Senate
—
Became law
—
Latest action · June 24, 2026
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 615.
Recorded votes
Floor votes carry every member's position; committee tallies carry totals only.
What members said
Releases that cite this bill first, then releases on the same topics.
Jacobs argues Congress should pursue both AI innovation and safety guardrails, addressing societal, model, deployer, and impact-level risks rather than prioritizing speed over safety.
Source ↗Clarke reintroduced legislation requiring disclosure when generative AI is used in political advertising to protect election transparency.
Source ↗Gottheimer touted bipartisan AI bills balancing innovation leadership with safeguards like pre-deployment testing and human control over AI agents.
Source ↗Ricketts supports strengthening American AI innovation and export controls on chips to China while backing 'commonsense guardrails' for safety without stifling innovation.
Source ↗Blunt Rochester describes meetings with AI experts and OpenAI leadership to discuss national security threats and recent AI safety issues, without stating a specific policy position.
Source ↗Kelly advocates legislation requiring human oversight and accountability for military AI, ensuring servicemembers can operate when AI systems fail.
Source ↗Barrett introduced legislation creating a Cabinet-level federal office to oversee AI and emerging technology threats and ensure strong guardrails.
Source ↗Gooden asked DNI Clayton to assess U.S. AI defenses against foreign adversaries and identify where congressional legislative action is needed.
Source ↗Bill data read 2026-10-22T14:48:01.167Z