{"id":"T000482","bioguide_id":"T000482","first_name":"Lori","last_name":"Trahan","full_name":"Lori Trahan","party":"D","state":"MA","chamber":"house","district":"3","title":"Representative","photo_url":null,"twitter_handle":"RepLoriTrahan","official_website":"https://trahan.house.gov","fec_candidate_ids":["H8MA03106"],"lis_id":null,"is_active":true,"term_start":"2025-01-03","term_end":"2027-01-03","created_at":"2026-09-08T22:51:51.014Z","updated_at":"2026-09-09T02:08:13.531Z","url":"https://whovotedwhy.com/politicians/T000482","score":{"id":"T000482","politician_id":"T000482","consistency_score":null,"influence_score":null,"conflict_index":null,"total_ai_votes":11,"total_statements":4,"total_donations_ai":5000,"top_donor_industries":[{"industry":"Google NetPAC","amount":5000,"vote_alignment":null}],"said_did_pairs":[],"computed_at":"2026-09-11T15:05:27.382Z"},"votes":[{"id":"74f74dc36858d7db","roll_call_id":"f8cf2822ee452352","bill_id":"239bd7e39dbe4641","politician_id":"T000482","position":"yea","voted_at":"2025-03-10","roll_call":{"id":"f8cf2822ee452352","chamber":"house","kind":"floor","category":"passage-suspension","congress":119,"session":1,"number":65,"date":"2025-03-10","question":"On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass","description":"Emerging Innovative Border Technologies Act","legislation":"H.R. 993","amendment":null,"committee":null,"bill_id":"239bd7e39dbe4641","result":"Passed","yeas":406,"nays":9,"positions_recorded":432,"positions_unmatched":0,"source_url":"https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2025/roll065.xml","ai_match":"bill","fetched_at":"2026-09-11T14:58:52.438Z"}},{"id":"c049578ea381fd27","roll_call_id":"3c8e529cc7178e96","bill_id":"36286542d88ed632","politician_id":"T000482","position":"yea","voted_at":"2025-04-28","roll_call":{"id":"3c8e529cc7178e96","chamber":"house","kind":"floor","category":"passage-suspension","congress":119,"session":1,"number":104,"date":"2025-04-28","question":"On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass","description":"TAKE IT DOWN Act","legislation":"S. 146","amendment":null,"committee":null,"bill_id":"36286542d88ed632","result":"Passed","yeas":409,"nays":2,"positions_recorded":433,"positions_unmatched":0,"source_url":"https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2025/roll104.xml","ai_match":"bill","fetched_at":"2026-09-11T14:58:52.438Z"}},{"id":"1676a57b8cb9b7be","roll_call_id":"646923fd69186607","bill_id":"a686788754d71445","politician_id":"T000482","position":"yea","voted_at":"2025-07-14","roll_call":{"id":"646923fd69186607","chamber":"house","kind":"floor","category":"passage-suspension","congress":119,"session":1,"number":192,"date":"2025-07-14","question":"On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass","description":"Consumer Safety Technology Act","legislation":"H.R. 1770","amendment":null,"committee":null,"bill_id":"a686788754d71445","result":"Passed","yeas":336,"nays":36,"positions_recorded":431,"positions_unmatched":0,"source_url":"https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2025/roll192.xml","ai_match":"bill","fetched_at":"2026-09-11T14:58:52.438Z"}},{"id":"0bfefccf47ac5e52","roll_call_id":"568b5e8fcd2727ab","bill_id":"b00414282069207d","politician_id":"T000482","position":"yea","voted_at":"2025-09-10","roll_call":{"id":"568b5e8fcd2727ab","chamber":"house","kind":"floor","category":"recommit","congress":119,"session":1,"number":261,"date":"2025-09-10","question":"On Motion to Recommit","description":"Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026","legislation":"H.R. 3838","amendment":null,"committee":null,"bill_id":"b00414282069207d","result":"Failed","yeas":208,"nays":219,"positions_recorded":432,"positions_unmatched":0,"source_url":"https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2025/roll261.xml","ai_match":"bill","fetched_at":"2026-09-11T14:58:52.438Z"}},{"id":"66ab189cda5566a8","roll_call_id":"6a91c1665ec27535","bill_id":"b00414282069207d","politician_id":"T000482","position":"nay","voted_at":"2025-09-10","roll_call":{"id":"6a91c1665ec27535","chamber":"house","kind":"floor","category":"passage","congress":119,"session":1,"number":262,"date":"2025-09-10","question":"On Passage","description":"Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026","legislation":"H.R. 3838","amendment":null,"committee":null,"bill_id":"b00414282069207d","result":"Passed","yeas":231,"nays":196,"positions_recorded":432,"positions_unmatched":0,"source_url":"https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2025/roll262.xml","ai_match":"bill","fetched_at":"2026-09-11T14:58:52.438Z"}},{"id":"4371b9afd7b0c7b4","roll_call_id":"0100b757ace90999","bill_id":"cf89b103e74a3844","politician_id":"T000482","position":"yea","voted_at":"2025-12-10","roll_call":{"id":"0100b757ace90999","chamber":"house","kind":"floor","category":"procedural","congress":119,"session":1,"number":319,"date":"2025-12-10","question":"On Motion to Commit","description":"To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disinter the remains of Fernando V. Cota from Fort Sam Houston National Cemetery, Texas, and for other purposes","legislation":"S. 1071","amendment":null,"committee":null,"bill_id":"cf89b103e74a3844","result":"Failed","yeas":209,"nays":216,"positions_recorded":433,"positions_unmatched":0,"source_url":"https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2025/roll319.xml","ai_match":"bill","fetched_at":"2026-09-11T14:58:52.438Z"}},{"id":"504334da48d02b88","roll_call_id":"a25c2a752d51bf81","bill_id":"cf89b103e74a3844","politician_id":"T000482","position":"yea","voted_at":"2025-12-10","roll_call":{"id":"a25c2a752d51bf81","chamber":"house","kind":"floor","category":"passage","congress":119,"session":1,"number":320,"date":"2025-12-10","question":"On Passage","description":"To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disinter the remains of Fernando V. Cota from Fort Sam Houston National Cemetery, Texas, and for other purposes","legislation":"S. 1071","amendment":null,"committee":null,"bill_id":"cf89b103e74a3844","result":"Passed","yeas":312,"nays":112,"positions_recorded":433,"positions_unmatched":0,"source_url":"https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2025/roll320.xml","ai_match":"bill","fetched_at":"2026-09-11T14:58:52.438Z"}},{"id":"af6bbaa01931695f","roll_call_id":"e27463e864c986ac","bill_id":"e3cfdab39518ca95","politician_id":"T000482","position":"yea","voted_at":"2026-01-20","roll_call":{"id":"e27463e864c986ac","chamber":"house","kind":"floor","category":"passage-suspension","congress":119,"session":2,"number":33,"date":"2026-01-20","question":"On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended","description":"AI for Main Street Act","legislation":"H.R. 5764","amendment":null,"committee":null,"bill_id":"e3cfdab39518ca95","result":"Passed","yeas":395,"nays":14,"positions_recorded":431,"positions_unmatched":0,"source_url":"https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2026/roll033.xml","ai_match":"bill","fetched_at":"2026-09-11T14:58:52.438Z"}},{"id":"06bd13ffb509511a","roll_call_id":"66fd8f27dd804f2b","bill_id":"d1696820d51b4d0f","politician_id":"T000482","position":"yea","voted_at":"2026-06-29","roll_call":{"id":"66fd8f27dd804f2b","chamber":"house","kind":"floor","category":"passage-suspension","congress":119,"session":2,"number":228,"date":"2026-06-29","question":"On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended","description":"KIDS Act","legislation":"H.R. 7757","amendment":null,"committee":null,"bill_id":"d1696820d51b4d0f","result":"Passed","yeas":267,"nays":117,"positions_recorded":431,"positions_unmatched":0,"source_url":"https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2026/roll228.xml","ai_match":"bill","fetched_at":"2026-09-11T14:58:52.438Z"}},{"id":"0adb58274999ef73","roll_call_id":"4e1afa79062efed0","bill_id":"98aac415e61b418b","politician_id":"T000482","position":"yea","voted_at":"2026-07-22","roll_call":{"id":"4e1afa79062efed0","chamber":"house","kind":"floor","category":"recommit","congress":119,"session":2,"number":277,"date":"2026-07-22","question":"On Motion to Recommit","description":"National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027","legislation":"H.R. 8800","amendment":null,"committee":null,"bill_id":"98aac415e61b418b","result":"Failed","yeas":213,"nays":216,"positions_recorded":431,"positions_unmatched":0,"source_url":"https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2026/roll277.xml","ai_match":"bill","fetched_at":"2026-09-11T14:58:52.438Z"}},{"id":"d68eaa38b207ea43","roll_call_id":"0738d91905dc4b0e","bill_id":"98aac415e61b418b","politician_id":"T000482","position":"nay","voted_at":"2026-07-22","roll_call":{"id":"0738d91905dc4b0e","chamber":"house","kind":"floor","category":"passage","congress":119,"session":2,"number":278,"date":"2026-07-22","question":"On Passage","description":"National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027","legislation":"H.R. 8800","amendment":null,"committee":null,"bill_id":"98aac415e61b418b","result":"Passed","yeas":216,"nays":212,"positions_recorded":431,"positions_unmatched":0,"source_url":"https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2026/roll278.xml","ai_match":"bill","fetched_at":"2026-09-11T14:58:52.438Z"}}],"statements":[{"id":"c93763add7843001","politician_id":"T000482","type":"press_release","content":"In a new analysis, the consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge backed Congresswoman Lori Trahan (D-MA-03) and Congressman Jay Obernolte’s (R-CA-23) Frontier Risk Oversight, National Transparency, Independent Evaluation, and Reporting (FRONTIER) Act, calling it the strongest proposal yet to manage the risks of the most powerful AI systems.\n\n“The frontier needs real rules, not voluntary guardrails. That requires binding legal regimes for evaluating and managing the risks from frontier models: as they are being developed, before they are deployed, and after they are in widespread use,” wrote Nicholas Garcia, Senior Policy Counsel at Public Knowledge. “The best proposal (so far) to move past frameworks, lists of principles, or nibbling at the edges of this challenge is the ‘Frontier Risk Oversight, National Transparency, Independent Evaluation, and Reporting (FRONTIER) Act’ from Representatives Jay Obernolte and Lori Trahan.”\n\n“For years, Public Knowledge has been one of the most serious and principled voices fighting to protect the public from the risks posed by cutting edge technologies. When they engaged in the discussion draft process, we took their criticisms seriously and worked with them to address their concerns,” said Congresswoman Trahan. “That kind of rigorous, good-faith feedback is a big reason the FRONTIER Act is the strongest frontier AI safety legislation ever introduced. Public Knowledge’s support is critical as we work to broaden the coalition backing this bipartisan bill and push for its consideration. We’re in a race against the clock right now, and Congress needs to act before the next major incident.”\n\nThe FRONTIER Act would establish a tiered, risk-based national framework for overseeing the most advanced AI models. It requires the largest developers to publish their safety frameworks, submit to independent third-party audits and verification, and report critical safety incidents to a new Under Secretary of Commerce for AI Security. The bill is an updated version of the Commerce-focused portions of Trahan and Obernolte's Great American AI Act (GAAIA) discussion draft. The sponsors reworked it over seven weeks of stakeholder feedback, narrowing its preemption of state law and sharpening its auditing and reporting provisions.\n\nPublic Knowledge's endorsement marks a notable evolution. When the sponsors released the GAAIA discussion draft in June, Public Knowledge opposed it, warning that its preemption clause reached too far and would lock states out of even light-touch AI transparency and evaluation rules. At the same time, the group made clear it was ready to work with the sponsors to get the policy right.\n\nTrahan and Obernolte took that feedback and rewrote the bill. When they introduced the FRONTIER Act in July, the preemption had been narrowed to cover only the catastrophic-risk issues the federal framework itself addresses, leaving state authority over child safety, privacy, consumer protection, and procurement intact. That change answered Public Knowledge's central concern, and the group now backs the bill.\n\nPublic Knowledge joins a broad, bipartisan coalition of AI policy experts and organizations that have praised the FRONTIER Act as the strongest federal AI safety proposal introduced to date.\n\nRead the full analysis HERE.\n\n###","url":"https://trahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3831","published_at":"2026-08-28","ai_topics":["safety","regulation","transparency","preemption"],"ai_stance":"support","ai_summary":"Trahan touts endorsement of her bipartisan FRONTIER Act, which would impose binding federal safety frameworks, third-party audits, and incident reporting on frontier AI developers.","ai_processed":true,"bill_ids":[],"ai_relevance_score":null,"bill_refs":[],"classifier":null},{"id":"b22764c0b96b2ff6","politician_id":"T000482","type":"press_release","content":"Less than a week after Congresswoman Lori Trahan (D-MA-03) and Congressman Jay Obernolte (R-CA-23) introduced the Frontier Risk Oversight, National Transparency, Independent Evaluation, and Reporting (FRONTIER) Act, a broad coalition of stakeholders is praising the bipartisan legislation that would establish a federal risk-based framework governing the development and deployment of the most advanced artificial intelligence models.\n\nThe FRONTIER Act would establish a tiered, risk-based national framework for oversight of the most advanced AI models, requiring the largest developers to publish safety frameworks, submit to independent third-party audits and verification, and report critical safety incidents to a new Under Secretary of Commerce for AI Security. It is an updated version of the Commerce-focused portions of the lawmakers’ Great American AI Act (GAAIA) discussion draft, reworked over seven weeks of stakeholder feedback to narrow its preemption of state law and sharpen its auditing and reporting provisions.\n\n“Not too long ago, a bipartisan bill this good and serious would have been a pipe dream. But things change quickly. This is by far the best AI safety bill ever introduced, in any jurisdiction,” said Charlie Bullock, Senior Research Fellow at the Institute for Law & AI. “There are still some flaws that I would like to see fixed, and some improvements to be made, but overall I'm very impressed with how well Reps. Trahan and Obernolte did on this. The next step is actually *passing* this kind of legislation, which unfortunately still seems like a pretty heavy lift. But this is a very promising first step.”\n\n“AI governance keeps running into the same wall. The technology is hard to measure and it moves faster than any law can keep up with,”said Andrew Freedman, Co-Founder and CEO of Fathom. “Trying to write the perfect rules and freezing them in place won’t work. What will work is a competitive market of independent verifiers who are accountable for real-world outcomes and who the government can actually count on. The FRONTIER Act shows we can move fast and still get this right.”\n\n“The latest version of the bipartisan Obernolte–Trahan framework, FRONTIER Act, is a serious step forward. It's one of the strongest efforts yet to establish a federal AI framework that protects Americans while preserving America's leadership in AI,” said the Alliance for a Better Future. “The bill gets several things right. Frontier developers would publish safety frameworks, file transparency reports before deployment, report serious safety incidents, and provide rapid notification when an imminent threat emerges. It also establishes meaningful emergency response authority and independent oversight for the most advanced AI systems. That's a targeted, risk-based approach that puts oversight where it's actually needed.”\n\n“Rep. Lori Trahan and Rep. Jay Obernolte's bipartisan FRONTIER Act deserves a lot of credit here; they are clearly engaged with stakeholders and civil society across the spectrum and have incorporated extensive feedback,” said Caleb Knapp, Senior Policy Manager and Secure AI Now. “In an ideal world, federal standards for frontier AI model pre-deployment would have crossed the finish line a year ago. Strongly addressing these issues is even more imperative as the technology develops further. We are seeing more instances of AI misalignment with OpenAI/Hugging Face, Kimi, and otherwise. Is the bill perfect? No. But it is the strongest federal frontier bill to date and builds on all the great work occurring at the state level in CA, NY, IL, and elsewhere.”\n\n“The FRONTIER Act is a meaningful bipartisan effort to strengthen oversight of the most advanced Al systems, and it's the strongest federal proposal to date. It builds on state regulations in many ways and incorporates a lot of the feedback that various stakeholders gave on the earlier discussion draft,” said the AI Verification & Evaluation Research Institute (AVERI). “There ","url":"https://trahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3825","published_at":"2026-07-28","ai_topics":["safety","regulation","transparency","preemption","innovation"],"ai_stance":"support","ai_summary":"Trahan touts her bipartisan FRONTIER Act establishing a tiered, risk-based federal oversight framework requiring frontier AI developers to publish safety frameworks, undergo third-party audits, and report safety incidents.","ai_processed":true,"bill_ids":[],"ai_relevance_score":null,"bill_refs":[],"classifier":null},{"id":"6f7fa178e91ea6f3","politician_id":"T000482","type":"press_release","content":"Today, Congresswoman Lori Trahan (D-MA-03) and Congressman Jay Obernolte (R-CA-23), alongside Representatives Scott Peters (D-CA-50), Scott Franklin (R-FL-18), Suhas Subramanyan (D-VA-10), and Erin Houchin (R-IN-09), introduced the Frontier Risk Oversight, National Transparency, Independent Evaluation, and Reporting (FRONTIER) Act. introduced the Frontier Risk Oversight, National Transparency, Independent Evaluation, and Reporting Act, or the FRONTIER Act. The bipartisan legislation, which was developed as part of the broader Great American AI Act framework, establishes a national, risk-based framework governing the development and deployment of the most advanced artificial intelligence models.\n\nThe FRONTIER Act establishes tiered requirements based on the size of a frontier AI developer, including model cards, risk-management frameworks, independent audits, incident reporting, and ongoing assessments. It also creates a uniform national standard for transparency, auditing, and reporting of catastrophic risk to prevent a patchwork of state regulations.\n\n“As AI systems grow more capable, Americans deserve confidence that the most powerful models are being developed responsibly,” said Congresswoman Trahan. “The bipartisan FRONTIER Act delivers commonsense transparency and independent oversight for the largest AI developers while giving them a single, clear national standard to build on. This is how we protect the public from catastrophic risks without slowing the innovation that keeps America competitive.”\n\n\"Artificial intelligence is advancing rapidly, and Congress must ensure our regulatory framework keeps pace without undermining American innovation,” said Congressman Obernolte. “The FRONTIER Act focuses oversight on the largest developers and most advanced models, requiring transparency, independent evaluation, and timely reporting of serious safety incidents. This legislation will protect Americans from catastrophic risk, provide developers with clear rules of the road, and ensure the United States remains the global leader in AI.”\n\n“The window to get AI policy right is closing, and Congress can't afford to miss it,” said Congressman Peters. “I supported Representatives Trahan and Obernolte's initial draft so we could develop a better bill that reflects how this technology works and where it's headed. Thanks to input from researchers, experts, and civil society advocates, that process worked. The FRONTIER Act is a targeted bill with clear, uniform transparency, and safety standards, instead of a fifty-state patchwork. I'm glad to support this bipartisan effort so that Congress acts before this technology outruns us.”\n\n\"The FRONTIER Act recognizes that not every AI developer should be regulated the same way. It takes a targeted approach by focusing only on the handful of companies developing the most powerful frontier AI models, not the startups and innovators driving America's AI ecosystem,” said Congressman Franklin. “By tying coverage to substantial AI research and development investments and requiring transparency and independent assessments from those developers, the bill avoids one-size-fits-all mandates and allows smaller innovators to spend their time building new technologies instead of navigating unnecessary federal red tape.\"\n\n“This is a four-alarm fire. We need to take action now. These frontier models could have the power to create serious chaos and harm without adequate regulations. This bill, while not perfect, is an important, bipartisan step in the right direction. We need a bill like this that can actually pass this Congress and get signed into law. But this is only the first step, and more action needs to be taken to protect people from the harm these models can cause,” said Congressman Subramanyan.\n\n\"America must lead the world in artificial intelligence, and we can do that while being clear-eyed about the risks,” said Congresswoman Houchin. “Just this week, one of the most advanced AI systems in the count","url":"https://trahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3823","published_at":"2026-07-23","ai_topics":["safety","regulation","transparency","preemption","innovation"],"ai_stance":"support","ai_summary":"Trahan backs a bipartisan risk-based federal oversight framework requiring transparency, audits, and incident reporting for frontier AI developers under a single national standard.","ai_processed":true,"bill_ids":[],"ai_relevance_score":null,"bill_refs":[],"classifier":null},{"id":"00f7010ad2bb0aba","politician_id":"T000482","type":"press_release","content":"Today, Congresswoman Lori Trahan (MA-03) supported the passage of two bipartisan pieces of legislation to protect ratepayers from increased utility costs caused by data centers during a House Energy and Commerce Committee markup. Both bills, the Ratepayer Protection Act and the Protecting Families from AI Data Center Energy Costs Act, are now eligible for consideration on the House floor.\n\n“It’s our job to make sure that when data centers are built, they're built on terms that work for the families who live nearby,” Congresswoman Trahan said. “That's what this legislation gets right. It says something simple. If you build the data center, you pay for the data center. The construction costs, the utility costs – those fall on the company, not the family down the street. This bill gives states a strong standard to make sure large load developers foot that bill themselves.”\n\nDuring the Committee markup, Trahan spoke in favor of both pieces of legislation. Footage of her remarks can be accessed HERE or by clicking the image below. A transcript is embedded below.\n\nData centers are the fastest-growing source of new electricity demand in the country, and the grid upgrades needed to serve them are not free. Someone has to pay for the new power plants, transmission lines, and substations, and too often that cost gets spread across everyone's monthly bill, leaving families and small businesses to subsidize the energy needs of some of the largest corporations in the world.\n\nTo combat this problem, the Ratepayer Protection Act gives state utility regulators clear standards to ensure large-load customers, meaning any new data or information storage facility drawing 100 megawatts or more, cover the full cost of the infrastructure they require. It requires those customers to recover the full incremental cost of grid upgrades over time and to provide financial assurances, so ratepayers stay protected even if a data center scales back or leaves entirely.\n\nSimilarly, the Protecting Families from AI Data Center Energy Costs Act directs the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to convene major stakeholders to examine how to shield residents from these rising costs, and it requires FERC to deliver a report with concrete recommendations and best practices so the energy costs tied to AI data centers are not passed on to ordinary consumers.\n\nDuring her remarks, Trahan pointed out that both bills are important first steps in protecting families from bearing the burden of increased utility costs caused by data centers. She argued that Congress must go further, including by passing a provision in her bipartisan Great American AI Act discussion draft released last month to improve data center efficiency and reduce their environmental footprint.\n\n“Both of these bills are good first steps, Mr. Chairman, but we should also be honest about what they don't do. They don't fully address the water these facilities draw from our communities. They don't answer the concern back home that when the grid is stretched, families worry they'll be deprioritized,” Congresswoman Trahan continued. “People in the district I represent are raising these questions, and they deserve answers. That's exactly why, when Congressman Obernolte and I drafted the Great American AI Act, we included provisions to make data centers more efficient and lessen their environmental footprint. Because the smarter we build these facilities, the less strain they put on the grid, on our water, and on the families who live nearby.”\n\nBoth bills passed unanimously and now move to the House floor for consideration by the full House of Representatives.\n\n-----------------------------------\n\nCongresswoman Lori Trahan\n\nRemarks as Delivered\n\nHouse Energy and Committee Markup\n\nJuly 21, 2026\n\nThank you, Mr. Chairman. I too support the Ratepayer Protection Act and look forward to advancing this bipartisan legislation to the House floor today.\n\nRight now, families across our country are afraid to open up their el","url":"https://trahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3815","published_at":"2026-07-21","ai_topics":["data_centers","regulation","transparency"],"ai_stance":"support","ai_summary":"Trahan backs bipartisan bills forcing AI data centers to pay their own grid costs and calls for going further on efficiency and environmental rules.","ai_processed":true,"bill_ids":["7bb65218ad2fd026","a43d67bbafe647d3"],"ai_relevance_score":null,"bill_refs":[{"bill_id":"7bb65218ad2fd026","method":"title"},{"bill_id":"a43d67bbafe647d3","method":"title"}],"classifier":null}],"donations":[{"id":"4042520251186679769","politician_id":"T000482","donor_name":"GOOGLE LLC NETPAC","donor_type":"pac","donor_employer":null,"employer_canonical":"Google NetPAC","donor_category":"company_pac","match_rule":"contributor_name:Google NetPAC","amount":5000,"donation_date":"2025-03-31","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00655647","fec_transaction_id":"4042520251186679769","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202504159756052677"}],"outside_spending_totals":[],"provenance":{"commit":"38624a3af16ec6b3fff9b27c7d1d9f2cb7fe9152","generated_at":"2026-09-11T15:06:57.105Z","schema_version":2,"manifest":"https://whovotedwhy.com/data/index.json"}}