{"id":"H001089","bioguide_id":"H001089","first_name":"Joshua","last_name":"Hawley","full_name":"Joshua Hawley","party":"R","state":"MO","chamber":"senate","district":null,"title":"Senator","photo_url":null,"twitter_handle":"SenHawleyPress","official_website":"https://www.hawley.senate.gov","fec_candidate_ids":["S8MO00160"],"lis_id":"S399","is_active":true,"term_start":"2025-01-03","term_end":"2031-01-03","created_at":"2026-09-08T22:51:51.014Z","updated_at":"2026-09-09T02:08:13.531Z","url":"https://whovotedwhy.com/politicians/H001089","score":{"id":"H001089","politician_id":"H001089","consistency_score":null,"influence_score":null,"conflict_index":null,"total_ai_votes":5,"total_statements":4,"total_donations_ai":7255,"top_donor_industries":[{"industry":"Anthropic","amount":7000,"vote_alignment":null},{"industry":"Amazon","amount":255,"vote_alignment":null}],"said_did_pairs":[],"computed_at":"2026-09-11T15:05:27.382Z"},"votes":[{"id":"45466d6e3d5a37c6","roll_call_id":"bca10742d0876330","bill_id":"cf89b103e74a3844","politician_id":"H001089","position":"yea","voted_at":"2025-12-17","roll_call":{"id":"bca10742d0876330","chamber":"senate","kind":"floor","category":"procedural","congress":119,"session":1,"number":648,"date":"2025-12-17","question":"On the Motion","description":"Motion to Concur in the House Amendment to S. 1071; A bill to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disinter the remains of Fernando V. Cota from Fort Sam Houston National Cemetery, Texas, and for other purposes.","legislation":"S. 1071","amendment":null,"committee":null,"bill_id":"cf89b103e74a3844","result":"Agreed to","yeas":77,"nays":20,"positions_recorded":100,"positions_unmatched":0,"source_url":"https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1191/vote_119_1_00648.xml","ai_match":"bill","fetched_at":"2026-09-11T14:58:52.438Z"}},{"id":"5d653608ed94e7dd","roll_call_id":"47dfb73a82b0a2ce","bill_id":"cf89b103e74a3844","politician_id":"H001089","position":"yea","voted_at":"2025-12-15","roll_call":{"id":"47dfb73a82b0a2ce","chamber":"senate","kind":"floor","category":"cloture","congress":119,"session":1,"number":647,"date":"2025-12-15","question":"On the Cloture Motion","description":"Motion to Invoke Cloture: Motion to Concur in the House Amendment to S. 1071; A bill to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disinter the remains of Fernando V. Cota from Fort Sam Houston National Cemetery, Texas, and for other purposes.","legislation":"S. 1071","amendment":null,"committee":null,"bill_id":"cf89b103e74a3844","result":"Agreed to","yeas":76,"nays":20,"positions_recorded":100,"positions_unmatched":0,"source_url":"https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1191/vote_119_1_00647.xml","ai_match":"bill","fetched_at":"2026-09-11T14:58:52.438Z"}},{"id":"0ba2eb434b386fe7","roll_call_id":"dd1489dacf44112f","bill_id":"cf89b103e74a3844","politician_id":"H001089","position":"not_voting","voted_at":"2025-12-11","roll_call":{"id":"dd1489dacf44112f","chamber":"senate","kind":"floor","category":"motion-to-proceed","congress":119,"session":1,"number":646,"date":"2025-12-11","question":"On the Motion to Proceed","description":"Motion to Proceed to the House Message to Accompany S. 1071; A bill to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disinter the remains of Fernando V. Cota from Fort Sam Houston National Cemetery, Texas, and for other purposes.","legislation":"S. 1071","amendment":null,"committee":null,"bill_id":"cf89b103e74a3844","result":"Agreed to","yeas":75,"nays":22,"positions_recorded":100,"positions_unmatched":0,"source_url":"https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1191/vote_119_1_00646.xml","ai_match":"bill","fetched_at":"2026-09-11T14:58:52.438Z"}},{"id":"10ed3a2ff1827168","roll_call_id":"5759c87e484cf21b","bill_id":null,"politician_id":"H001089","position":"yea","voted_at":"2025-07-01","roll_call":{"id":"5759c87e484cf21b","chamber":"senate","kind":"floor","category":"amendment","congress":119,"session":1,"number":363,"date":"2025-07-01","question":"On the Amendment","description":"To strike the section relating to support for artificial intelligence.","legislation":"H.R. 1","amendment":"S.Amdt. 2814","committee":null,"bill_id":null,"result":"Agreed to","yeas":99,"nays":1,"positions_recorded":100,"positions_unmatched":0,"source_url":"https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1191/vote_119_1_00363.xml","ai_match":"keyword","fetched_at":"2026-09-11T14:58:52.438Z"}},{"id":"216e3aba98d0023d","roll_call_id":"de7744646acadb2c","bill_id":"fe01c2d25c573f9b","politician_id":"H001089","position":"nay","voted_at":"2026-07-16","roll_call":{"id":"de7744646acadb2c","chamber":"senate","kind":"floor","category":"motion-to-proceed","congress":119,"session":2,"number":199,"date":"2026-07-16","question":"On the Motion to Proceed","description":"Motion to Proceed to S.J. Res. 198; A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services of the Department of Health and Human Services relating to \"Medicare Program; Implementation of Prior Authorization for Select Services for the Wasteful and Inappropriate Services Reduction (WISeR) Model\".","legislation":"S.J.Res. 198","amendment":null,"committee":null,"bill_id":"fe01c2d25c573f9b","result":"Rejected","yeas":46,"nays":50,"positions_recorded":100,"positions_unmatched":0,"source_url":"https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00199.xml","ai_match":"bill","fetched_at":"2026-09-11T14:58:52.438Z"}},{"id":"d8d1630e20063614","roll_call_id":"1582c6eb48e4c5fc","bill_id":"c3a830c9118e3ee4","politician_id":"H001089","position":"yea","voted_at":"2026-07-14","roll_call":{"id":"1582c6eb48e4c5fc","chamber":"senate","kind":"floor","category":"cloture","congress":119,"session":2,"number":195,"date":"2026-07-14","question":"On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed","description":"Motion to Invoke Cloture: Motion to Proceed to S. 4784; An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2027 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes.","legislation":"S. 4784","amendment":null,"committee":null,"bill_id":"c3a830c9118e3ee4","result":"Rejected","yeas":50,"nays":46,"positions_recorded":100,"positions_unmatched":0,"source_url":"https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00195.xml","ai_match":"bill","fetched_at":"2026-09-11T14:58:52.438Z"}}],"statements":[{"id":"e52c98cd73b5825e","politician_id":"H001089","type":"press_release","content":"WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) expanded his investigation into artificial intelligence surveillance cameras. He sent letters to the chief executive officers of Motorola Solutions, Verkada, and Axon Enterprise, informing them of his investigation into the companies’ collection and use of citizens’ personal data. Senator Hawley previously sent a letter to Flock regarding its use of AI surveillance cameras.\n\nSenator Hawley wrote, “As Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism, I am investigating your company’s collection, retention, and dissemination of the data generated by its artificial intelligence surveillance cameras. On August 26th, I wrote to your competitor Flock Safety to express my concerns regarding the size and pervasiveness of its network and demanding answers as to reports of abuse and costly errors from its technology. However, Flock does not stand alone in this industry; you and others are building large camera networks, assisted by artificial intelligence, that intrude on the privacy of all Americans.”\n\nHe continued, “Recent examples of abuse and misuse of personal data reveal the woeful lack of safeguards in these systems. Last month in Missouri, the St. Charles County Police Department terminated its contract with Flock after an audit revealed that a civilian employee had run Flock searches for personal reasons, completely unrelated to his or her law enforcement duties. Sadly, my home state is not an outlier. In Milwaukee, prosecutors charged a police officer who allegedly used Flock to search his girlfriend’s license plate 124 times and her former boyfriend’s plate 55 times, entering ‘investigation’ as his justification each time. Worse still, the officer was not caught by Flock’s audit systems—he was caught because a private citizen looked up his own plate on a public website.”\n\n“To be sure, I want law enforcement to have tools to catch offenders and keep the public safe. But the surveillance network your company has constructed raises legitimate concerns about how little-known corporations possess intimate knowledge of Americans’ lives, fueled by invasive artificial intelligence algorithms. The Supreme Court recognizes that a comprehensive, retrospective record of a person’s movements is different in kind from ordinary observation in public, and Congress never authorized the network your industry has built. Your company’s internal policies are, in practice, the only safeguards for hundreds of millions of Americans. People across the country are now discovering that fact and demanding answers from their elected officials,” Hawley concluded.\n\nRead Senator Hawley’s full letter to the Motorola Solutions CEO here or below.\n\nRead Senator Hawley’s letter to the CEO of Verkada here.\n\nRead Senator Hawley’s letter to the CEO of Axon Enterprise here.\n\nGreg Brown\n\nChief Executive Officer\n\nMotorola Solutions\n\n500 W. Monroe St, Suite 4400\n\nChicago, IL 60661\n\nDear Mr. Brown:\n\nAs Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism, I am investigating your company’s collection, retention, and dissemination of the data generated by its artificial intelligence surveillance cameras.\n\nOn August 26th, I wrote to your competitor Flock Safety to express my concerns regarding the size and pervasiveness of its network and demanding answers as to reports of abuse and costly errors from its technology. However, Flock does not stand alone in this industry; you and others are building large camera networks, assisted by artificial intelligence, that intrude on the privacy of all Americans.\n\nTaking Flock alone, in a few short years, Flock has assembled an unprecedented national surveillance network. Flock boasts more than 120,000 cameras across 49 states and more than 20 billion vehicle scans every month. The overwhelming majority of the Americans captured in those records did nothing wrong. Instead of serving discrete local investigations, as contemplated by our cons","url":"https://www.hawley.senate.gov/hawley-expands-investigation-into-surveillance-cameras-warns-flock-competitors/","published_at":"2026-09-03","ai_topics":["privacy","regulation","transparency","national_security"],"ai_stance":"support","ai_summary":"Hawley is investigating AI surveillance camera companies, arguing Congress never authorized these invasive AI-driven networks and that corporate self-policing is an inadequate safeguard.","ai_processed":true,"bill_ids":[],"ai_relevance_score":null,"bill_refs":[],"classifier":null},{"id":"41aff0e53b891631","politician_id":"H001089","type":"press_release","content":"WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) penned an op-ed in The Daily Wire following the announcement of his investigation into companies like Flock, with its network of 120,000 AI-powered cameras across the United States. Senator Hawley raises concerns about how Flock’s collection of citizens’ data and personal information poses privacy threats and potentially violates existing laws.\n\nRead the full op-ed here or below.\n\nEvery month, AI-powered cameras take 20 billion snapshots of cars in America. In almost every case, these photos capture drivers who did nothing wrong. These are regular folks on their way to work, picking up kids at school, or driving to church. Now, they are understandably asking what happens to the data captured by a network of more than 120,000 of these Flock cameras nationwide.\n\nEven though this is new technology, it raises an issue older than our country itself. In 1761, a Boston lawyer named James Otis went to court to fight against something called writs of assistance, which gave customs officers virtually unlimited authority to search anywhere for smuggled goods. After the colonial court did not stop the writs, John Adams said American independence was born “then and there.” Otis never argued against law enforcement or the need for searches. He objected to open-ended authority without any limiting rules.\n\nToday, Congress has not written any rules governing the data captured by national AI camera networks built by Flock Safety and similar companies. It may be governed by older statutes, and should have Fourth Amendment limits, but those are unsettled questions. For now, for practical purposes, the only privacy protections for hundreds of millions of Americans are those found in one company’s internal policies. I don’t know if Flock has broken the law, but I do know that technology is moving faster than Congress is keeping up. So I have opened an investigation in the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism, which I chair, into how this data is collected, retained, searched, and sold.\n\nI heard about this issue in my home state of Missouri. The St. Charles County Police Department canceled its Flock contract this month, after an audit found a civilian employee running searches for personal reasons. Sadly, my state is not alone. In Milwaukee, prosecutors charged an officer with searching his girlfriend’s plate 124 times and her former boyfriend’s plate 55 times, typing the word “investigation” in the software’s justification field each time. Worse still, the system’s audit didn’t catch him; a private citizen did, after looking up his plate on a public website.\n\nAdding insult to injury, the systems make mistakes. A Florida woman spent 13 days in jail on eight felony counts, three for vehicular homicide, after investigators searched Flock’s network for a vehicle description and arrested the owner. The prosecutors later dropped the charges because they had the wrong person. Los Angeles dropped its Flock contract after an audit found officers had stopped 161 drivers wrongly flagged as driving stolen cars. Another California police department found that 71 percent of its alerts were wrong.\n\nThen we consider what happens to records generated by these cameras. Flock boasts an $8.3 billion valuation, which brings commercial pressures. Americans deserve to know whether and how their driving data is licensed, sold, and used. There are also concerns about whether data is sent or stored abroad. For example, reporters have described Flock using gig workers in the Philippines to classify data captured by cameras. Powerful AI models also automate parts of the process, supercharging these concerns.\n\nAll that said, I want police to have the tools they need. Cameras can help recover stolen cars, find missing children, and catch fleeing criminals. But people are concerned when private companies build unprecedented databases of personal information and want reasonable safeguards for that data. And the","url":"https://www.hawley.senate.gov/hawley-op-ed-why-i-am-investigating-flock/","published_at":"2026-08-28","ai_topics":["privacy","regulation","transparency","national_security"],"ai_stance":"support","ai_summary":"Hawley argues Congress has written no rules for AI-powered camera networks like Flock and has opened an investigation to establish reasonable safeguards on how that data is collected, retained, searched, and sold.","ai_processed":true,"bill_ids":[],"ai_relevance_score":null,"bill_refs":[],"classifier":null},{"id":"73e19a5a2714d951","politician_id":"H001089","type":"press_release","content":"WASHINGTON — Today, as Chairman of the Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism, U.S. Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) launched an investigation into Flock Safety’s AI-powered web of thousands of cameras across the nation. As part of the investigation, Hawley is demanding Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley provide answers as to what safeguards the company employs to protect Americans’ data.\n\nThe investigation is the latest initiative in Hawley’s work to protect Americans from AI surveillance and privacy threats. Just two weeks ago, Senator Hawley held a hearing exposing the exploitative practices of AI surveillance pricing and consumer data harvesting.\n\n“As Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism, I am investigating Flock Safety’s collection, retention, and dissemination of the data generated by its artificial intelligence surveillance cameras. In a few short years, Flock has assembled an unprecedented national surveillance network. Your company boasts more than 120,000 cameras across 49 states and more than 20 billion vehicle scans every month. The overwhelming majority of the Americans captured in those records did nothing wrong. Instead of serving discrete local investigations, as contemplated by our constitutional processes and safeguards, these camera networks harness artificial intelligence to pool what they capture into a national database that customers can search,” wrote Senator Hawley.\n\nHe continued, “To be sure, I want law enforcement to have tools to catch offenders and keep the public safe. But Americans do not surrender their privacy rights when they drive to work, drop their kids off at school, or go to church. The Supreme Court has recognized that a comprehensive, retrospective record of a person’s movements is different in kind from ordinary observation in public. Congress never authorized the network your industry has built. Your company’s internal policies are, in practice, the only safeguards for hundreds of millions of Americans. People across the country are now discovering that fact and demanding answers from their elected officials.”\n\n“In light of this abuse of driver information, the American people want to know who has access to their personal data and how. This investigation will seek those answers. To facilitate that, please produce all documents and information specified in the attached annex no later than September 8, 2026. If you have questions about the scope of these requests, please contact my office to discuss,” Senator Hawley concluded.\n\nRead the full letter here or below.\n\nAugust 26, 2026\n\nGarrett Langley\n\nChief Executive Officer\n\nFlock Safety\n\n3284 Northside Parkway NW\n\nAtlanta, GA 30327\n\nDear Mr. Langley:\n\nAs Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism, I am investigating Flock Safety’s collection, retention, and dissemination of the data generated by its artificial intelligence surveillance cameras.\n\nIn a few short years, Flock has assembled an unprecedented national surveillance network. Your company boasts more than 120,000 cameras across 49 states and more than 20 billion vehicle scans every month. The overwhelming majority of the Americans captured in those records did nothing wrong. Instead of serving discrete local investigations, as contemplated by our constitutional processes and safeguards, these camera networks harness artificial intelligence to pool what they capture into a national database that customers can search.\n\nRecent examples of abuse and misuse of personal data reveal the woeful lack of safeguards in these systems. In Missouri, the St. Charles County Police Department terminated its contract this month after an audit revealed that a civilian employee had run Flock searches for personal reasons, completely unrelated to their law enforcement duties. Sadly, my home state is not an outlier. In Milwaukee, prosecutors charged a police officer who allegedly searched his girlfriend’s license plate 124 t","url":"https://www.hawley.senate.gov/chairman-hawley-investigates-ai-powered-flock-cameras-amidst-privacy-concerns/","published_at":"2026-08-26","ai_topics":["privacy","national_security","regulation","transparency"],"ai_stance":"support","ai_summary":"Hawley opens an investigation into Flock Safety's AI camera network, arguing Congress never authorized this mass surveillance and Americans' privacy needs real safeguards.","ai_processed":true,"bill_ids":[],"ai_relevance_score":null,"bill_refs":[],"classifier":null},{"id":"e202e0950deb998a","politician_id":"H001089","type":"press_release","content":"WASHINGTON — Yesterday, U.S. Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), as Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism, held a hearing exposing the exploitative practices of AI surveillance pricing and consumer data harvesting used by large corporations to scam working Americans out of their hard-earned money.\n\nSenator Hawley opened, “Hardly a day goes by in this town, without some booster of AI talking about how it’s going to transform the American economy for the better, the question is whose betterment will this transformation lead to? … We’re here today to talk about one of the effects of this AI boom: the partnership between the AI industry and some of the biggest corporations in America to effectively scam consumers out of every last dollar they have in order to buy products that they need and rely on … This is one of the biggest scams in American history. This marriage between the AI industry and these mega corporations, and they’re trying to pull it off against every American consumer. AI surveillance pricing is the unholy trinity of everything Americans hate: spying on people, ripping them off, and taking away jobs.“\n\n“Earlier this year, there was a disturbing incident that played out on Twitter on X that shed some light, I think, on how airlines are using surveillance pricing in real time, right in front of us. I think I’ve got the relevant exchange over my shoulder here. You have an ex-user who, in April, this is April of this year, posted that he had seen a $230 price increase in one day when he was booking travel for a funeral on JetBlue. $230 price increase. Now, here’s the interesting thing: JetBlue’s own corporate account helpfully responded to him and instructed him to clear the cache and the cookies, or use an incognito window,” Senator Hawley began.\n\n“Now, Ms. Owens, you’re familiar with this incident, I assume. Can you explain to us broadly what is what’s going on here?” he asked Dr. Lindsay Owens, the President and CEO of Groundwork Collaborative, about airline surveillance pricing.\n\nDr. Owens responded, “This really simple tweet basically is a confession of two things. The first thing in asking the customer to clear their browser before purchasing flights, you know that the company is tracking your browser history. The second thing we know is that they are using the data that they collect in their pricing decisions, and in this case, adversely, the price is going to be higher for this individual based on their browsing history. But I also think this is such an important example because it shows that surveillance pricing isn’t just about things like income. This is about desperation. This individual is trying to get to the funeral. He needs this ticket urgently. He wants to attend, and that can be weaponized against consumers. This isn’t about the rising jet fuel prices. That’s not what’s going into an end to their pricing decision. Desperation is driving this decision.”\n\nSenator Hawley continued, “Let me just ask you, Dr. Owens. I think it’s pretty clear. But what’s the motive here? I mean, what is JetBlue’s motive?”\n\nLaying down the hammer, she answered, “This is about profit. The data that powers the surveillance pricing engine is estimated to be a $700 billion industry by 2030.”\n\n“What other kinds of information do these companies have that they can use to set these personalized, scam, I would say, prices?” Hawley questioned.\n\n“Unfortunately for consumers, the answer is, increasingly, nearly everything. It’s your location data, it’s behavioral data, what you buy, what you don’t buy, what you keep in your cart, it’s demographic data. If you login with a loyalty program to fly, they know how many people are in your family, whether you have kids, where you go frequently. And as we know, with AI, as companies build enterprise agents, people often start conversing with these companies, and they have the information that you tell them,” Dr. Owens testified.\n\nSenator Hawley exposed that AI s","url":"https://www.hawley.senate.gov/icymi-hawley-exposes-predatory-ai-surveillance-pricing-consumer-data-harvesting-in-subcommittee-hearing/","published_at":"2026-08-05","ai_topics":["privacy","jobs","transparency","regulation"],"ai_stance":"support","ai_summary":"Hawley condemns AI-driven surveillance pricing and consumer data harvesting as a scam on working Americans requiring congressional scrutiny and action.","ai_processed":true,"bill_ids":[],"ai_relevance_score":null,"bill_refs":[],"classifier":null}],"donations":[{"id":"4080220261540444615","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"LISTER, MARK MR.","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":10,"donation_date":"2026-06-22","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4080220261540444615","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202607159875064304"},{"id":"4080220261540444614","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"LISTER, MARK MR.","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":5,"donation_date":"2026-06-08","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4080220261540444614","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202607159875064304"},{"id":"4080220261540444613","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"LISTER, MARK MR.","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":10,"donation_date":"2026-05-18","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4080220261540444613","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202607159875064303"},{"id":"4080220261540444612","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"LISTER, MARK MR.","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":5,"donation_date":"2026-05-04","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4080220261540444612","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202607159875064303"},{"id":"4080220261540444611","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"LISTER, MARK MR.","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":10,"donation_date":"2026-04-20","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4080220261540444611","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202607159875064303"},{"id":"4050720261509658734","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"LISTER, MARK MR.","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":10,"donation_date":"2026-03-24","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4050720261509658734","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202604159857247433"},{"id":"4050720261509658733","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"LISTER, MARK MR.","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":5,"donation_date":"2026-03-09","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4050720261509658733","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202604159857247432"},{"id":"4050720261509658732","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"LISTER, MARK MR.","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":10,"donation_date":"2026-02-23","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4050720261509658732","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202604159857247432"},{"id":"4050720261509658731","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"LISTER, MARK MR.","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":5,"donation_date":"2026-02-09","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4050720261509658731","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202604159857247432"},{"id":"4050720261509658730","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"LISTER, MARK MR.","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":10,"donation_date":"2026-01-20","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4050720261509658730","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202604159857247431"},{"id":"4030920261419992143","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"LISTER, MARK MR.","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":5,"donation_date":"2025-12-31","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4030920261419992143","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202601319795295590"},{"id":"4030920261419992142","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"LISTER, MARK MR.","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":10,"donation_date":"2025-12-23","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4030920261419992142","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202601319795295590"},{"id":"4030920261419992141","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"LISTER, MARK MR.","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":5,"donation_date":"2025-12-08","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4030920261419992141","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202601319795295589"},{"id":"4030920261419988885","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"DUONG, BAO","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":25,"donation_date":"2025-12-08","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4030920261419988885","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202601319795295171"},{"id":"4030920261419992140","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"LISTER, MARK MR.","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":10,"donation_date":"2025-11-24","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4030920261419992140","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202601319795295589"},{"id":"4030920261419992139","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"LISTER, MARK MR.","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":5,"donation_date":"2025-11-10","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4030920261419992139","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202601319795295589"},{"id":"4030920261419988884","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"DUONG, BAO","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":25,"donation_date":"2025-11-10","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4030920261419988884","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202601319795295170"},{"id":"4030920261419992138","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"LISTER, MARK MR.","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":10,"donation_date":"2025-10-20","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4030920261419992138","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202601319795295588"},{"id":"4030920261419992137","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"LISTER, MARK MR.","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":5,"donation_date":"2025-10-06","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4030920261419992137","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202601319795295588"},{"id":"4030920261419988883","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"DUONG, BAO","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":25,"donation_date":"2025-10-06","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4030920261419988883","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202601319795295170"},{"id":"4121820251299073697","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"DUONG, BAO","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":25,"donation_date":"2025-09-08","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4121820251299073697","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202510159790805149"},{"id":"4121820251299073696","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"DUONG, BAO","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"AMAZON","employer_canonical":"Amazon","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Amazon","amount":25,"donation_date":"2025-08-05","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4121820251299073696","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202510159790805149"},{"id":"4042320251186212841","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"LOFGREN, PETER","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"ANTHROPIC","employer_canonical":"Anthropic","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Anthropic","amount":3500,"donation_date":"2025-03-19","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4042320251186212841","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202504159755365625"},{"id":"4042320251186212204","politician_id":"H001089","donor_name":"LOFGREN, PETER","donor_type":"individual","donor_employer":"ANTHROPIC","employer_canonical":"Anthropic","donor_category":"employee","match_rule":"contributor_employer:Anthropic","amount":3500,"donation_date":"2025-03-19","cycle":2026,"fec_committee_id":"C00652727","fec_transaction_id":"4042320251186212204","filing_url":"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?202504159755365412"}],"outside_spending_totals":[],"provenance":{"commit":"38624a3af16ec6b3fff9b27c7d1d9f2cb7fe9152","generated_at":"2026-09-11T15:06:57.105Z","schema_version":2,"manifest":"https://whovotedwhy.com/data/index.json"}}