119th Congress · HR.10210 In committee [Congress.gov ↗](https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/10210) [JSON](https://whovotedwhy.com/data/bills/618f9cd7d3c80fd9.json) [Report an error](mailto:hello@jonasneves.com?subject=WhoVotedWhy%20correction%3A%20bill%20hr10210&body=Row%20or%20page%3A%20bill%20hr10210%0AWhat%20is%20wrong%3A%0APrimary%20source%20that%20shows%20it%3A%0A)

# Doctors Not AI Act of 2026

Summary, written by a model from the CRS summary

Only the title is provided, which refers to keeping AI from replacing doctors; no text is available.

Model-rated AI relevance 80%: The title deals directly with AI in medical practice. (claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026)

healthcare ai safety

GL

Sponsored by

[Greg LandsmanDemocrat OH](https://whovotedwhy.com/politicians/L000601)

Data as of: bills Oct 22, 2026 · votes Oct 21, 2026 · statements Oct 19, 2026. [What changed](https://whovotedwhy.com/data/changes.json)

## Progress

1.  Introduced
    
    Sep 1, 2026
    
2.  Reported by committee
    
    —
    
3.  Passed House
    
    —
    
4.  Passed Senate
    
    —
    
5.  Became law
    
    —
    

Latest action · September 1, 2026

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

## What members said

Releases that cite this bill first, then releases on the same topics.

[Tom Barrett](https://whovotedwhy.com/politicians/B001321) Republican toward oversight Sep 1, 2026 · cites this bill by title

Barrett's bipartisan Doctors Not AI Act would bar AI from making medical-necessity insurance denials and require disclosure of AI use.

[Source ↗](https://barrett.house.gov/media/press-releases/barrett-helps-introduce-bipartisan-bill-protect-patients-ai-insurance-denials)

[Greg Landsman](https://whovotedwhy.com/politicians/L000601) Democrat toward oversight Sep 1, 2026 · cites this bill by title

Landsman's Doctors Not AI Act would keep licensed clinicians, not algorithms, in charge of medical-necessity decisions with transparency for patients.

[Source ↗](https://landsman.house.gov/posts/landsman-introduces-bipartisan-legislation-to-keep-ai-from-making-health-care-decisions)

[Kim Schrier](https://whovotedwhy.com/politicians/S001216) Democrat toward oversight Sep 1, 2026 · cites this bill by title

Schrier's Doctors Not AI Act would require doctors rather than AI systems to make health coverage decisions, with oversight and disclosure.

[Source ↗](https://schrier.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-schrier-introduces-bipartisan-legislation-keep-ai-making-health)

[Sara Jacobs](https://whovotedwhy.com/politicians/J000305) Democrat toward oversight Oct 16, 2026 · same topic

Jacobs argues Congress should pursue both AI innovation and safety guardrails, addressing societal, model, deployer, and impact-level risks rather than prioritizing speed over safety.

[Source ↗](https://sarajacobs.house.gov/news/press-releases/rep-sara-jacobs-pens-newsweek-op-ed-on-how-to-win-the-ai-race)

[Pete Ricketts](https://whovotedwhy.com/politicians/R000618) Republican mixed Oct 14, 2026 · same topic

Ricketts supports strengthening American AI innovation and export controls on chips to China while backing 'commonsense guardrails' for safety without stifling innovation.

[Source ↗](https://www.ricketts.senate.gov/news/press-releases/ricketts-champions-ai-innovation-and-safety/)

[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez](https://whovotedwhy.com/politicians/O000172) Democrat toward oversight Oct 13, 2026 · same topic

Ocasio-Cortez and colleagues urge the FAA to pause its AI air traffic management tool until safety testing, oversight, and accountability questions are answered.

[Source ↗](https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/media/press-releases/ocasio-cortez-mcclain-delaney-beyer-mfume-subramanyam-and-elfreth-lead-calls)

[Lisa Blunt Rochester](https://whovotedwhy.com/politicians/B001303) Democrat neutral Oct 13, 2026 · same topic

Blunt Rochester describes meetings with AI experts and OpenAI leadership to discuss national security threats and recent AI safety issues, without stating a specific policy position.

[Source ↗](https://www.bluntrochester.senate.gov/news/press-releases/news-senator-blunt-rochester-returns-from-congressional-delegation-visits-on-coast-guard-ai-national-security/)

[Mark Kelly](https://whovotedwhy.com/politicians/K000377) Democrat toward oversight Oct 13, 2026 · same topic

Kelly advocates legislation requiring human oversight and accountability for military AI, ensuring servicemembers can operate when AI systems fail.

[Source ↗](https://www.kelly.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/icymi-kelly-writes-washington-times-op-ed-on-keeping-humans-in-command-as-ai-transforms-warfare/)

Bill data read 2026-10-22T14:48:01.167Z